By Julia Lang
The second week I was volunteering at a foundation for street children in Guayaquil, Ecuador, during my semester abroad in college, a volunteer doctor asked if I would sit in on his check-ups with the young women (age 6-14). Once their clothes were removed, child after child showed scars, bruises, hidden shame and pain. I began to realize that these children, who sold soda on the street for 5 cents and went days before collecting enough money to return home, were survivors and pawns in an oppressive, patriarchal society over which they had no control.
The world I had known was stripped bare, exposing the harsh realities and structural inequities of decades of oppression. The lives of these children and their families were so radically different from my white, middle-class life in upstate New York. The more I learned, the more I realized just how much I did not know, a mental shift that continues to drive my curiosity, behavior and interaction with students and with myself today.
As my semester in Ecuador unfolded, I became painfully aware of our unjust world and the need to work for positive change. This experience, compounded by my service experiences in the Dominican Republic (in high school), Nicaragua (in college), and leading service trips in Costa Rica (post-college), prompted me to explore the following questions for my Master’s thesis at Oregon State University (degree to be conferred this May):
- What differences in global citizenship, if any, are there among students who did international service in college vs. those who attended traditional study-abroad programs or did not go abroad at all?
- Does studying abroad foster significant changes in global citizenship and challenge and expand students’ worldviews? If so, to what extent, compared with students who engaged in international service-learning?
- How do various factors impact students’ levels of global citizenship – is global citizenship a result of maturity alone, or do any of the following factors have a significant impact: race/ethnicity, gender, year in school, age, length of time abroad, host family experience, community service abroad and more than 40 hours of community service?
First, I explored what educators call “global citizenship” and best practices for service-learning via the following:
- I researched the historical context of civic education and service-learning (Astin & Sax, 1998; Bacon, 1997; Dewey, 1951; Hartman, 2008; National Service-Learning Clearinghouse, 2008; Rocheleau, 2004).
- I compiled results from studies demonstrating the positive impact of service-learning on students’ growth, ambition, engagement and critical thinking abilities (Berson & Younkin, 1998; Bryan, Schonermann & Karpa, 2011; Colsby, Bercaw, Clark & Galiardi, 2009; Eyler & Giles 1997; Kielsmeier, 2011; Markus, Howard, & King, 1993; Myers-Lipton 1998).
- I examined the academic, personal and social benefits of service-learning, particularly international service-learning (Gray, Murdock, & Stebbins, 2002), such as higher levels of critical thinking skills (Opper, Teichler, & Carlson, 1990), cross-cultural effectiveness (Coryell, 2009), self-reliance, and self-confidence (Batchelder & Root, 1994).
- I explored the “shadow side” of service-learning, focusing on international service-learning—how these experiences can not only exacerbate power differences and reinforce inequities between those who serve and those being served (Brown, 2011; Davis, 2006; Green, 2001; Kahn, 2011; Nieto, 2000; Pompa, 2002; Madsen-Camacho, 2004), but also lead to academic difficulties, cultural identity crises, anxiety, depression, social isolation, helplessness, interpersonal conflict, confusion, and anger (Hartman, 2008; Kiely, 2005; Kittredge, 1998; Martin, 1984; Sahin, 1990; Tonkin and Quiroga, 2004; Zapf, 1991).
- I demonstrated the need for critical service-learning, where students grapple with the intersections of power, privilege, and oppression on a personal level at the service site and at a global level by learning about the historical, political, and social systems that created and reinforce systems of oppression (Green, 2001; Kahn, 2011; Levinson, 1990; Madsen-Camacho, 2004; Mitchell, 2008; O’Grady, 2000; Pompa, 2002; Walker, 2000). For instance, students either learn how to serve a hot meal to the homeless, or they learn about why homelessness exists in the first place and what they can do as active citizens to help address this social phenomenon.
- I discovered that the literature suggests that certain program elements can have a dramatic impact on students’ levels of global citizenship. These elements include:
- Reflection (Lutterman-Aguliar & Gingerich, 2002; Peterson, 2002),
- Orientations and re-emersion workshops (Gaw, 2000; Hartman, 2008; Kiely, 2005; Kittredge, 1998; Martin, 1984; Sahin, 1990; Zapf, 1991; Tonkin & Quiroga, 2004),
- Critical service and an examination of root causes of global issues (Chesler, 1995; Chesler & Vasques Scalera, 2000; Groski, 2006; Mitchell, 2008; Pompa, 2002; Robinson, 2002),
- Overt examination of power and privilege (Kahn, 2011; Kendall, 2006; Madsen-Camacho, 2004; McKeown, 2009; Tatum, 1992),
- An analysis of power and privilege for all students (Nieto, 2000; Rosenberger, 2000), and:
- For white students, continual reflection and analysis of their own white identity and white privilege (hooks, 1989; Endres & Gould, 2009; Green, 2001; McIntosh, 1998; Mitchell, 2008; Nieto 2000; Tatum, 1992; Simons, Fehr, Hogerwerff, Georganas & Russel, 2011).
- I reviewed various measures of global citizenship, deciding to use a scale put forth by Morais & Ogden (2010), where global citizenship is defined as the presence of social responsibility, global competence and global civic engagement, categorized by not only an awareness of the world around you, but also an awareness of the self.
318 students filled out questionnaires; they were grouped as those who (a) had engaged in experiential study abroad experiences (differing in length, ratio of classroom to service-learning time and host family versus dormitory or apartment living), (b) had participated in traditional study abroad programs (attending a university to take classes and living in a dorm, with no service component), or (c) did not study abroad at all.
The results were striking. I found no significant differences in scores based on race/ethnicity, gender, year in school, age, or length of time abroad. However, students who had stayed with a host family or did community service – especially 40+ hours of community service –scored much higher on the global citizenship scale (the best scores of any group tested). Furthermore I found no significant difference between the traditional study abroad students and those who did not go abroad.
These dramatic findings suggest that studying abroad is not enough, a fact that is often ignored as educators push for students to study abroad, but might not be concerned whether the program has any cultural or service immersion components.
My findings indicate that intensive cultural immersion and service, particularly extensive service abroad, is a crucial component to promote global citizenship. Even after accounting for individual background and characteristics, as well as a study abroad experience, students who stayed with host families and engaged in service experienced significant gains in measures of global citizenship. These findings suggest that we must look beyond the checkbox of whether students study abroad or not, and create meaningful and reciprocal experiences in which students can engage, serve, and become culturally immersed in their host communities.
In an age categorized by “interdependence, rather than insularity” (Liberal Education & America’s Promise, 2009, p. 15), today’s graduates must be more globally informed, aware, and engaged than ever before as international markets merge and the world becomes exponentially more interconnected (Plater, 2011) and “flat” (Freidman, 2005). The need to develop global citizens on campuses nationwide is immediate as more students than ever are studying abroad.
But this isn’t enough.
Study abroad programs might be falling short by failing to engage students in issues of social justice and/or empowering them to achieve real social change and develop as global citizens.
By deliberately incorporating immersion, structured reflection, and reciprocity into cultural and community immersion experiences, institutions of higher education can produce graduates who are more globally competent, engaged, and committed to multicultural and global issues and to making their local and global community more just.
Astin, A. W., & Sax, L. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39(3), 251-263.
Bacon, N. A. (1997). The transition from classroom to community contexts for writing. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California, Berkeley.
Batchelder , T.H., and & Root, S. (1994) Effects of an undergraduate program to integrate academic learning and service: Cognitive, prosocial cognitive, and identity outcomes, Journal of Adolescence, 17 (34), 341-356.
Berson, J. S., & Younkin, W. F. (1998). Doing well by doing good: A study of the effects of a service-learning experience on student success. Paper presented at the American Society of Higher Education, Miami, FL.
Brown, N. C. (2011). A 360-degree view of international service learning. In R. G. Bringle, J. A. Hatcher, & S. G. Jones (Eds.), International service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research (pp. 57-68). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Bryan, A, J., Schonemann, N., & Karpa, D. (2011). Integrating service-learning into the university classroom. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Chesler, M. (1995). Service, service-learning, and changemaking. In J. Galura, J. Howard, D. Waterhouse, & R. Ross (Eds.), Praxis iii: Voices in dialogue (pp. 137-142). Ann Arbor, MI: OCSL Press.
Chesler, M., & Vasques Scalera, C. (2000). Race and gender issues related to service-learning research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Special Issue, 18-27.
Colsby, S., Bercaw, L., Clark, A. M., & Galiardi, S. (2009). From community service to service-learning leadership: a program perspective. New Horizons in Education, 57(3), 20-31.
Coryell, J.E. (2009) Critical transformational learning: Collective inquiry and inspiring a global educational vision. Conference Proceedings of the Standing Conference on University Teaching and Research in the Education of Adults (pp. 97-105). University of Cambridge, UK.
Davis, A. (2006). What we don’t talk about when we talk about service. In A. Davis & E. Lynn (Eds.), The Civically Engaged Reader (1-7). Great Books Foundation, 2006.
Dewey, J. (1951). Experience and education. 13th ed., New York, NY: The MacMillan Company.
Endres, D., & Gould, M. (2009). I am also in the position to use my whiteness to help them out. The communications of whiteness in service learning. Western Journal of Communication, 73(1), 418-436.
Eyler, J., & Giles, D.E., Jr. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Friedman, T.L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Gaw, K.F. (2000). Reverse culture shock in students returning from overseas. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(1), 83-104.
Gray, K., Murdock, G., & Stebbins, C. (2002). Assessing study abroad’s effect on an international mission. Change, 37(3), 45-51.
Green, A.E. (2001). “But you aren’t White”: Racial perceptions and service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 8, 18-26.
Groski, P. C. (2006). Complicity with conservatism: The de-politicizing of multicultural and intercultural education. Intercultural Education, 17(2), 163-177.
Hartman, E, M. (2008) Educating for global citizenship through service-learning: A theoretical account and curricular evaluation. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from EBSCO. University of Pittsburgh.
hooks, b. (1989). Talking Back: Thinking Feminism, thinking black. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Kahn, H. E. (2011). Overcoming the challenges of international service learning: A visual approach to sharing authority, community development, and global learning. In R. G. Bringle, J. A., Hatcher & S. J. Jones (Eds.), International Service Learning (pp. 113-125). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Kendall, F. (2006). Understanding white privilege: Creating pathways to authentic relationships across race. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kiely, R. (2005). Transformative international service-learning. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(1), 275-281.
Kielsmeier, J. (2011). Service-learning: The time is now. The Prevention Researcher, 18, 3-7.
Kittredge, C. (1988, April 3). Growing up global. The Boston Globe Magazine, pp. 37–41.
Levinson, L. M. (1990). Choose engagement over exposure. In J. C. Kendall (Ed.), Combining service and learning: A resource book for community and public service (pp. 68-75). Raleigh, NC: National Society for Internships and Experiential Education.
Liberal Education & America’s Promise. (2009). College learning for the new global century: A report from the national leadership council for liberal education and America’s promise. Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from www.aacu.org.
Lutterman-Aguilar, A., & Gingerich, O. (2002). Experiential pedagogy for study abroad: Educating for global citizenship. Frontiers, 8, 41-81.
Madsen-Camacho, M. (2004). Power and privilege: Community service learning in Tijuana. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19 (3), 31-42.
Markus, G.B., Howard, J.P.F., & King, D.C. (1993). Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(4), 410-419.
Martin, J. N. (1984). The intercultural reentry: Conceptualization and directions for future research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 115-134.
McIntosh, P. (1998). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. In Re-visioning family therapy: Race, culture, and gender in clinical practice, ed. Monica McGoldrick,147-152. New York: Guilford Press.
McKeown, J.S. (2009). The first time effect: The impact of study abroad on college student intellectual development. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Mitchell, T.D. (2008). Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12(2), 50-65.
Morais, D., & Ogden, A. (2010). Initial development and validation of the global citizenship scale. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(5), 445-466.
Myers-Lipton, S. J. (1996). Effect of service-learning on college students’ attitudes toward international understanding. Journal of College Student Development, 37(6), 659-667.
National Service-Learning Clearinghouse. (2008). What is service-learning? Retrieved from www.servicelearningorg/what_is_service-learning/index.php
Nieto, S. (2000). Foreword. In C.R. O’Grady (Ed.), Integrating service learning and multicultural education in colleges and universities (pp1-19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
O’Grady, C. (2009). Integrating service learning and multicultural education: An overview. In C.R. O’Grady (Ed.), Learning and multicultural education in colleges and universities (pp. 1-21). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Opper, S., Teichier, U., & Carlson, J. (1990). Impact of study abroad programs on students and graduates. London, U.K.: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Peterson, C.F. (2002). Preparing engaged citizens: Three models of experiential education for social justice. Frontiers, 8, 165-206.
Plater, W. M. (2011). The context for international service learning: An invisible revolution is underway. In R. G. Bringle, J. A. Hatcher, & S. G. Jones (Eds.), International service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research (pp. 29-56). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Pompa, L. (2002). Service-learning as crucible: Reflections on immersion, context, power, and transformation. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(1), 67-76.
Robinson, T. (2000a). Service learning as justice advocacy: Can political scientists do politics? PS: Political Science and Politics, 33(3), 605-612
Rocheleau, J. (2004). Theoretical roots of service-learning: Progressive education and the development of citizenship. In B.W. Speck (Ed.), Service-learning: History, theories and issues (pp 3-27). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Rosenberger, C. (2000). Beyond empathy: Developing critical consciousness through service learning. In C. R. O’Grady (Ed.), Integrating service learning and multicultural education in colleges and universities (pp 23-43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sahin, N.H. (1990). Re-entry and the academic and psychological problems of the second generation. Psychology and Developing Societies, 2 (2) (1990), 165–182.
Simons L., Fehr, L., Black, N., Hogerwerff, F., Georganas, D., & Russel, B. (2011). The application of racial identity development in academic-based service learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 72-83.
Tatum, B. D. (1992). Talking about race, learning about racism: The application of racial identity development theory in the classroom. Harvard Educational Review, 62(1), 1-24
Tonkin, Humphrey & Diego Quiroga. (2004). A qualitative approach to the assessment of international service-learning. Frontiers 10, Fall: 163-182.
Walker, T. (2000). A feminist challenge to community service: A call to politicize service-learning. In B. J. Balliet & K. Heffernan (Eds.), The practice of change: Concepts and models for service-learning in women’s studies (pp. 25-45). Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Zapf, D. (1991). Cross-cultural transitions and wellness: Dealing with culture shock. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 14, 105–119.
Julia Lang completed her B.S. at Cornell University, where she spent a service-learning semester in New York City studying Multiculturalism, a semester in Guayaquil, Ecuador working at a foundation for street children, and led service trips throughout Nicaragua over winter breaks. Upon graduation, Julia led high school students on community service trips throughout Costa Rica, worked as a study abroad adviser for AFS, and spent the summer of 2012 in Sri Lanka learning how to lead international service trips. Julia is currently a Master’s Candidate in the College Student Services Administration program at Oregon State University and works at the Center for Civic Engagement. She previously wrote a related blog entry for this site: Transformation Experience: Service-Learning Student to Scholar.